<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cut down on the forum categories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/</link>
	<description>Community Building</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: feamor</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-22495</link>
		<dc:creator>feamor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-22495</guid>
		<description>It is my biggest problem now. I am developing a tech forum about hardware, software and programming. I have a large friend community who are in this job. I asked their ideas and needs then take feedback about which categories there should be. 

After creating all, I face with the question if i should cut down some of the categories or not. 

I am worried about moving topics to newly created categories can cause broken links and affect search engine ranking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my biggest problem now. I am developing a tech forum about hardware, software and programming. I have a large friend community who are in this job. I asked their ideas and needs then take feedback about which categories there should be. </p>
<p>After creating all, I face with the question if i should cut down some of the categories or not. </p>
<p>I am worried about moving topics to newly created categories can cause broken links and affect search engine ranking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed - Blog Author</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-17333</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed - Blog Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-17333</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nauczyciel&lt;/strong&gt; - Yes, as the site grows you will need to add more categories. I am not saying a large number of forum categories are always a bad thing - they are only to be avoided when your community is new and these new categories are unable to justify their keep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nauczyciel</strong> &#8211; Yes, as the site grows you will need to add more categories. I am not saying a large number of forum categories are always a bad thing &#8211; they are only to be avoided when your community is new and these new categories are unable to justify their keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nauczyciel</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-17297</link>
		<dc:creator>Nauczyciel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-17297</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree with you but you concentrated only on how to get the things moving when the forum is brand new and shiny but without any contributions. I believe that later on you would  stillhave to divide the categories into subcategories or you&#039;ll end up with a complete mess.

The questions is, will you have enough time and commitment to do this once the forum has been populated. It&#039;d involve copying the entries, educating your users, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree with you but you concentrated only on how to get the things moving when the forum is brand new and shiny but without any contributions. I believe that later on you would  stillhave to divide the categories into subcategories or you&#8217;ll end up with a complete mess.</p>
<p>The questions is, will you have enough time and commitment to do this once the forum has been populated. It&#8217;d involve copying the entries, educating your users, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choosing a name for your forum categories &#187; Online Community Building</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Choosing a name for your forum categories &#187; Online Community Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>[...] said before, you should only ensure you have a large number of categories if your community can support them; there is nothing worse than visiting a forum for the first time to see empty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said before, you should only ensure you have a large number of categories if your community can support them; there is nothing worse than visiting a forum for the first time to see empty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using polls to understand your members &#187; Online Community Building</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>Using polls to understand your members &#187; Online Community Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>[...] responses? The data will be worthless and your community will look empty to new visitors, just as empty forum categories leave a bad first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] responses? The data will be worthless and your community will look empty to new visitors, just as empty forum categories leave a bad first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When members request new forum categories &#187; Online Community Building</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>When members request new forum categories &#187; Online Community Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>[...] the beginning of June, I wrote an article entitled &#8216;Cut down on the forum categories&#8216;. In the article, I wrote about why there is nothing worse than having too many forum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the beginning of June, I wrote an article entitled &#8216;Cut down on the forum categories&#8216;. In the article, I wrote about why there is nothing worse than having too many forum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>Hi liam - Thanks for your comment. I completely agree - there is nothing wrong with having a large number of categories if you have the membership base and interaction to support them.

Having a huge number of categories when you first start only draws attention to the young age and lack of activity on your forum, and should be avoided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi liam &#8211; Thanks for your comment. I completely agree &#8211; there is nothing wrong with having a large number of categories if you have the membership base and interaction to support them.</p>
<p>Having a huge number of categories when you first start only draws attention to the young age and lack of activity on your forum, and should be avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve created many forums, and it not only makes it harder to read when you have 300 different categories but no one will really know where to post what.

Now if you have 30k users and everyone posts regularly, maybe expanding the categories would be useful. It&#039;s probably not a good idea to start with though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve created many forums, and it not only makes it harder to read when you have 300 different categories but no one will really know where to post what.</p>
<p>Now if you have 30k users and everyone posts regularly, maybe expanding the categories would be useful. It&#8217;s probably not a good idea to start with though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>I think you have made a move for the better by grouping such specific niches into a generalised &#039;hold-all&#039; category.

Good luck with your community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have made a move for the better by grouping such specific niches into a generalised &#8216;hold-all&#8217; category.</p>
<p>Good luck with your community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiley</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/cut-down-on-the-forum-categories/#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>I find it difficult to pass up on good advice when it&#039;s offered openly &amp; free.

Instead of deleting different forums, I&#039;ve merged 3/4 of them together.

I had, for instance, a music forum, a forum for television and a separate one completely for film &amp; cinema. I&#039;ve simply made an &quot;Entertainment&quot; forum now to chuck them all into one, and done the same with all the other forums.

The boards look much smaller, but, a lot less empty already even with very few posts at the moment.

And you&#039;re right, it does look a lot more appealing than scrolling down to see &quot;0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it difficult to pass up on good advice when it&#8217;s offered openly &amp; free.</p>
<p>Instead of deleting different forums, I&#8217;ve merged 3/4 of them together.</p>
<p>I had, for instance, a music forum, a forum for television and a separate one completely for film &amp; cinema. I&#8217;ve simply made an &#8220;Entertainment&#8221; forum now to chuck them all into one, and done the same with all the other forums.</p>
<p>The boards look much smaller, but, a lot less empty already even with very few posts at the moment.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right, it does look a lot more appealing than scrolling down to see &#8220;0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
