<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep your moderators personal but identifiable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/</link>
	<description>Community Building</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed - Community Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-23564</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed - Community Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-23564</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Steve&lt;/strong&gt; - You make a good point. It&#039;s important that you give moderators guidelines to follow - especially when you&#039;ve taken them from your membership pool.

The fact is, as you rightly state, people view the opinions of moderators and other staff members differently to those of other members. You need to remind your moderators of this and give them precise guidelines as to what kind of discussions you are happy for them to be involved in, and those they are to avoid.

Moderators should still share their own opinions and display their own personalities, but they need to be aware of the extra weight their voice can carry. In the example you mention, it may be worth the community manager advising moderators to clearly state that their opinions are their own - and not necessarily those of the community or administration as a whole.

It might even be useful to get the moderators to add something in their signatures to this effect.

I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Steve</strong> &#8211; You make a good point. It&#8217;s important that you give moderators guidelines to follow &#8211; especially when you&#8217;ve taken them from your membership pool.</p>
<p>The fact is, as you rightly state, people view the opinions of moderators and other staff members differently to those of other members. You need to remind your moderators of this and give them precise guidelines as to what kind of discussions you are happy for them to be involved in, and those they are to avoid.</p>
<p>Moderators should still share their own opinions and display their own personalities, but they need to be aware of the extra weight their voice can carry. In the example you mention, it may be worth the community manager advising moderators to clearly state that their opinions are their own &#8211; and not necessarily those of the community or administration as a whole.</p>
<p>It might even be useful to get the moderators to add something in their signatures to this effect.</p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-23562</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-23562</guid>
		<description>My question is, if moderators retain their normal username and they themselves often have strong opinions about various topics, the community often takes their posting more seriously and sometimes believe they &quot;represent the official view&quot; of the forum.

How do you prevent this? Apart from having stricter guidelines for moderators?

A real example: Someone asked an opinion on  Camping XYZ, and the first three posters were 3 moderators all slating it. Which is fair enough, it&#039;s their personal view. However, The forum received criticism and negativity as other posters, who did like Camping site XYZ, took this as the &quot;official&quot; view of the community.

Would it not be good to have two different usernames - for instance &quot;Steve&quot; and &quot;Steve - Mod&quot; with all personal views and opinions being posted under the &quot;Steve&quot; account? Is it not easier then to spearate personal vs official view?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is, if moderators retain their normal username and they themselves often have strong opinions about various topics, the community often takes their posting more seriously and sometimes believe they &#8220;represent the official view&#8221; of the forum.</p>
<p>How do you prevent this? Apart from having stricter guidelines for moderators?</p>
<p>A real example: Someone asked an opinion on  Camping XYZ, and the first three posters were 3 moderators all slating it. Which is fair enough, it&#8217;s their personal view. However, The forum received criticism and negativity as other posters, who did like Camping site XYZ, took this as the &#8220;official&#8221; view of the community.</p>
<p>Would it not be good to have two different usernames &#8211; for instance &#8220;Steve&#8221; and &#8220;Steve &#8211; Mod&#8221; with all personal views and opinions being posted under the &#8220;Steve&#8221; account? Is it not easier then to spearate personal vs official view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-18741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-18741</guid>
		<description>The only things moderators can do to discourage a member is to abuse their power which can properly be  dealt with by the admin. How the moderators interact would never affect my registration matter of fact I&#039;m on some forums now and wonder how members became mods but I still use the forums and the only reason I know who the moderators are, is because of consistent use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only things moderators can do to discourage a member is to abuse their power which can properly be  dealt with by the admin. How the moderators interact would never affect my registration matter of fact I&#8217;m on some forums now and wonder how members became mods but I still use the forums and the only reason I know who the moderators are, is because of consistent use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meadd823.</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-18304</link>
		<dc:creator>meadd823.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-18304</guid>
		<description>We begin as regular members when we accept the position of moderator we keep our original user names. Our user name it self changes colors with section moderator being green and supermoderators in a dark orange and administration in red. We can customize our group ID -  most of us keep the word moderator in the title some where &quot;vaccinate super-moderator&quot; was a recent one I used. 

Also on the forum opening  page the various section of the forum are listed as are the user names of the moderators assigned to  the section. The front page of each section as the moderators listed at the bottom. We aren&#039;t difficult to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We begin as regular members when we accept the position of moderator we keep our original user names. Our user name it self changes colors with section moderator being green and supermoderators in a dark orange and administration in red. We can customize our group ID &#8211;  most of us keep the word moderator in the title some where &#8220;vaccinate super-moderator&#8221; was a recent one I used. </p>
<p>Also on the forum opening  page the various section of the forum are listed as are the user names of the moderators assigned to  the section. The front page of each section as the moderators listed at the bottom. We aren&#8217;t difficult to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goundoulf</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-17741</link>
		<dc:creator>goundoulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-17741</guid>
		<description>All of my moderators have regular usernames, as they started as users. But now they belong to a different group of users, and the description shown under their name in every post clearly says they are moderators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of my moderators have regular usernames, as they started as users. But now they belong to a different group of users, and the description shown under their name in every post clearly says they are moderators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed - Blog Author</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-15409</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed - Blog Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-15409</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Laetus&lt;/strong&gt; - I like the way you and your staff have &#039;regular&#039; user names. Moderators with generic, almost &#039;robotic&#039; names don&#039;t help you build relationships with your members. Anonymity is not going to create an environment of trust, which is what successful online communities require.

It sounds like you have the right strategy, and are reaping the rewards of having a more open, transparent relationship with your members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Laetus</strong> &#8211; I like the way you and your staff have &#8216;regular&#8217; user names. Moderators with generic, almost &#8216;robotic&#8217; names don&#8217;t help you build relationships with your members. Anonymity is not going to create an environment of trust, which is what successful online communities require.</p>
<p>It sounds like you have the right strategy, and are reaping the rewards of having a more open, transparent relationship with your members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaetusAtheos</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-15329</link>
		<dc:creator>LaetusAtheos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-15329</guid>
		<description>The &#039;staff&#039; for my forum is only myself, my husband (as admins) and one moderator.  The only thing we use to identify ourselves as such is a rank bar stating our positions.  Other than that, we have our personal user names.

I have participated on a forum that operated by having moderators who were mod1 mod2 etc and those who were moderators had a separate user name that they used to post.  The identities of the moderators were kept secret from those without &quot;back room&#039; access.  In my opinon, that was a disaster because members tended to get upset with the anonomous moderators since they had no way to know if it was a member that may have biases or not.  

My more personal system has never resulted is too much turmoil, just the occasional civil disussion when a member does question a staff action.  It is a lot harder to attack the actions of an admin/mod if you have had pleasant discussions with them in the past and have grown to trust their judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;staff&#8217; for my forum is only myself, my husband (as admins) and one moderator.  The only thing we use to identify ourselves as such is a rank bar stating our positions.  Other than that, we have our personal user names.</p>
<p>I have participated on a forum that operated by having moderators who were mod1 mod2 etc and those who were moderators had a separate user name that they used to post.  The identities of the moderators were kept secret from those without &#8220;back room&#8217; access.  In my opinon, that was a disaster because members tended to get upset with the anonomous moderators since they had no way to know if it was a member that may have biases or not.  </p>
<p>My more personal system has never resulted is too much turmoil, just the occasional civil disussion when a member does question a staff action.  It is a lot harder to attack the actions of an admin/mod if you have had pleasant discussions with them in the past and have grown to trust their judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed - Blog Author</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-13388</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed - Blog Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-13388</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kevin&lt;/strong&gt; - As we all know, an upgrade or conversion rarely runs to plan! I am glad you got everything sorted out relatively quickly albeit after a lot of hard work!

It&#039;s a good job the majority of your users were happy with the upgrade - failing to consult them before such a huge change always risks a backlash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kevin</strong> &#8211; As we all know, an upgrade or conversion rarely runs to plan! I am glad you got everything sorted out relatively quickly albeit after a lot of hard work!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good job the majority of your users were happy with the upgrade &#8211; failing to consult them before such a huge change always risks a backlash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Malone</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-13365</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-13365</guid>
		<description>Mr. Reed--

The conversion process should have went smoothly, if not for the phpMyadmin version I was using for my previous board software, as it didn&#039;t have &quot;compatibility mode&quot;, and therefore there were duplicates that had to have a huge manual FIND and REPLACE done for. This was during the process of moving the database over to the same server the vBulletin installation was on (my paid server space, rather than that of my friend, who was hosting the forum for me until I got it), so that the upgrade can be made. Said problem wasn&#039;t a big deal, and nothing was lost; it just took a lot of time (the forum was back up on vB within 48 hours after we (me and my friend, a fellow admin) started the process. 

I&#039;m glad I made the change. I already familiarized myself with vB before hand, so I knew what to expect. I was planning the upgrade for many months. 

Reading your response to me in another post on your blog, I did agree that it would have been best to consult my members before making the upgrade. But fortunately, many of them were actually thrilled with the change, or just didn&#039;t care either way. The most bitter reaction was a user who also runs a forum, but uses IPB. He said he thinks vB was a bad choice, but still leagues better than phpBB. There was another, not as bitter, just being confused about a few features (either that he could no longer find, or that he could now find). Me and some members were quick to help him out, and all his questions have been answered to his satisfaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Reed&#8211;</p>
<p>The conversion process should have went smoothly, if not for the phpMyadmin version I was using for my previous board software, as it didn&#8217;t have &#8220;compatibility mode&#8221;, and therefore there were duplicates that had to have a huge manual FIND and REPLACE done for. This was during the process of moving the database over to the same server the vBulletin installation was on (my paid server space, rather than that of my friend, who was hosting the forum for me until I got it), so that the upgrade can be made. Said problem wasn&#8217;t a big deal, and nothing was lost; it just took a lot of time (the forum was back up on vB within 48 hours after we (me and my friend, a fellow admin) started the process. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I made the change. I already familiarized myself with vB before hand, so I knew what to expect. I was planning the upgrade for many months. </p>
<p>Reading your response to me in another post on your blog, I did agree that it would have been best to consult my members before making the upgrade. But fortunately, many of them were actually thrilled with the change, or just didn&#8217;t care either way. The most bitter reaction was a user who also runs a forum, but uses IPB. He said he thinks vB was a bad choice, but still leagues better than phpBB. There was another, not as bitter, just being confused about a few features (either that he could no longer find, or that he could now find). Me and some members were quick to help him out, and all his questions have been answered to his satisfaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed - Blog Author</title>
		<link>http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-13356</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed - Blog Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityspark.com/keep-your-moderators-personal-but-identifiable/#comment-13356</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kevin&lt;/strong&gt; - That really looks great. How did you find the conversion process? Are you glad you make the change? How did your members react?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kevin</strong> &#8211; That really looks great. How did you find the conversion process? Are you glad you make the change? How did your members react?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

